2016 – Page 5 – Animal Rights The Abolitionist Approach

Animal Aid, a UK group that promotes welfare reform, has a new campaign. Animal Aid wants your help (and donations) to stop a large pig farm from being approved and built in Lincolnshire. Here is a screenshot of the description of this campaign:

Click to enlarge.

If this campaign is successful, the facility will be built somewhere else.

The pigs will be tortured and killed anyway.

If Animal Aid succeeds in stopping this facility from being built anywhere else (unlikely to the point of near impossibility), smaller facilities will be built instead to satisfy demand.

The pigs will be tortured and killed anyway.

If Animal Aid succeeds in stopping all new pig facilities from being built (a complete impossibility), existing facilities will expand to meet demand.

The pigs will be tortured and killed anyway.

Question: So what does a campaign like this achieve in terms of helping animals?

Answer: Nothing. Absolutely nothing. If the campaign succeeds, not a single animal will be saved.

Indeed, the net effective of this campaign is negative.

The campaign reinforces the idea in the minds of the public that the problem is how these animals are raised and not that we exploit these vulnerable victims at all. This campaign explicitly reinforces the idea that pork that comes from a smaller facility is pork that is more morally desirable.

This sort of campaign reassures the public that it can continue to consume animals–but not from this sort of facility.

The fact that Animal Aid offers a “Go-Vegan” pack does not make an inherently flawed welfarist campaign okay.

The only way we are going to stop animal exploitation is to educate people so that they recognize that if animals matter morally, we cannot treat them as resources and that we have an obligation to stop eating, wearing, and using them.

We need to educate people to understand that, if animals matter morally, veganism is a moral imperative.

Look at it this way: the lowest estimate of vegans in the UK is 150,000. The UK population is 64 million. If each of those vegans convinced one other person to go vegan in the next year, there would be 300,000. If the pattern is repeated each year, we would have 600,000, 1.2 million, 2.4 million, 4.8 million, 9.6 million, 19.2 million, 38.4 million, 76.8 million. A vegan UK in nine years.

So you can do your part by engaging in creative abolitionist vegan education. Or you can spend your time or give your money to people who are proposing solutions that will not only not help animals, but will send the wrong message to people.

The choice is yours.

Gary L. Francione
Board of Governors Distinguished Professor of Law
Rutgers University

**********

If you are not vegan, please go vegan. Veganism is about nonviolence. First and foremost, it’s about nonviolence to other sentient beings. But it’s also about nonviolence to the earth and nonviolence to yourself.

If animals matter morally, veganism is not an option — it is a necessity. Anything that claims to be an animal rights movement must make clear that veganism is a moral imperative.

The World is Vegan! If you want it.

Learn more about abolitionist veganism at www.HowDoIGoVegan.com.

Remember that when you are speaking to a nonvegan, you are dealing with someone who thinks that consuming animal products is as natural–and necessary–as breathing and your challenge sounds as bizarre as a suggestion that they stop breathing!

This is one reason why it is important to know enough about the nutritional aspects of veganism to be able to engage in substantive discussion about this.

Some claim that any discussion of health means that you are downplaying the moral point. That is false and applies only to situations where you argue that someone ought to go vegan primarily for health reasons. I am talking about engaging and addressing the view that animal protein is necessary for health. That is very different.

Although we say that, in our view, a healthy vegan diet is far better for health than any alternative, we always follow up and say something like: “But that isn’t the point. The point is that there is no evidence that you can’t be healthy on a healthy vegan diet. Animal products are not necessary.” And that is the point.

If people are going to think about the moral issue clearly, they need to understand that the moral imperative of veganism does not translate into a “you are obligated to do that which will physically harm you” norm.

Educate yourself so you can educate others. Here’s a good place to start.

Gary L. Francione
Board of Governors Distinguished Professor of Law
Rutgers University

Anna Charlton
Adjunct Professor of Law
Rutgers University

**********

If animals matter morally, veganism is not an option — it is a necessity. Anything that claims to be an animal rights movement must make clear that veganism is a moral imperative.

The World is Vegan! If you want it.

Learn more about abolitionist veganism at www.HowDoIGoVegan.com.